Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Robin Montgomery vs Amandine Hesse Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Montgomery vs Hesse analysis and find out who is favored!
Robin Montgomery vs Amandine Hesse Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Montgomery 0 - 0 Hesse
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Montgomery has won 48.51% of points on their second serve, while Hesse has won 45.43%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Montgomery, in recent form, has won 52% of their opponent's second serve points, while Hesse has won 53.96%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.19% and 40.58% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Montgomery has saved 62.16% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hesse has saved 53.4% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Montgomery has won 62% of matches played (W/L 31/ 19), with Hesse winning 56.67% (W/L 51/ 39) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Montgomery has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 71% (W/L 5/ 2), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 26/ 20). Hesse has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 114/ 79), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 27% (W/L 3/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Montgomery has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 65.63% of matches (W/L 21/ 11), where as Hesse has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 51/ 34). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Montgomery has played against opponents with an average rank of 248.62 while Hesse has played against players with an average rank of 277.29.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Montgomery has won 43% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hesse has won 46% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Montgomery has converted 41.22% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hesse has converted 47.34% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
180
Rank
143
High
19
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
275
Rank
154
High
31
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
Form
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
61% (106-67)
Career Total W/L
53% (407-364)
65% (20-11)
YTD W/L
55% (22-18)
$223,291
Career Prize Money
$226,834
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Montgomery VS Hesse H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Robin Montgomery | Amandine Hesse |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 65% (20/11) | 55% (22/18) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 64% (46/26) | 54% (50/42) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (346/305) | 51% (405/387) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 63% (5/3) | 67% (10/5) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 63% (12/7) | 53% (9/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) | 38% (3/5) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.36 | 0.31 |
| Aces Total | 116 | 120 |
| DFs per game | 0.44 | 0.33 |
| DFs Total | 140 | 127 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:41:1 | 1:34:12 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 194.39 | 305.88 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (1229/2035) | 50% (1247/2474) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (846/1229) | 64% (800/1247) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (395/806) | 46% (562/1227) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (106/260) | 47% (154/329) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (965/2242) | 46% (1211/2658) |
| Slam W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 57% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 65% (11/6) | 58% (22/16) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 65% (20/31) | 55% (21/38) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 60% (3/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (4/10) | 50% (7/14) |
| 1st set W, W | 89% (19/17) | 82% (22/18) |
| 1st set W, L | 11% (19/2) | 18% (22/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (12/3) | 22% (18/4) |
Robin Montgomery Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Robin Montgomery
Player
Annelin Bakker
63%
(
53 of
84)
1st Serve %
63%
(
74 of
118)
5
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
10
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
47 of
74)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
18%
(
3 of
17)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
27 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
50 of
118)
107
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Leolia Jeanjean
Player
Robin Montgomery
54%
(
48 of
89)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
89)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
89)
94
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Robin Montgomery
Player
Brenda Fruhvirtova
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
32%
(
7 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
64
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Robin Montgomery
Player
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
51%
(
21 of
41)
1st Serve %
75%
(
40 of
53)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
14 of
21)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
15 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Moyuka Uchijima
Player
Robin Montgomery
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
89)
2
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
4
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
20%
(
4 of
20)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
89)
81
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Robin Montgomery
Player
Alison Van Uytvanck
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Robin Montgomery
71%
(
72 of
101)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
96)
8
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
4
71%
(
51 of
72)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
32 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
96)
109
Total Points Won
88
|
6-1 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Robin Montgomery
Player
Katie Boulter
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve %
50%
(
40 of
80)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
80)
82
Total Points Won
79
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Robin Montgomery
Player
Elina Avanesyan
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
57%
(
24 of
42)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arantxa Rus
Player
Robin Montgomery
75%
(
47 of
63)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Amandine Hesse Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Jil Teichmann
Player
Amandine Hesse
50%
(
36 of
72)
1st Serve %
47%
(
36 of
77)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
61%
(
22 of
36)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
13 of
41)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
47 of
77)
90
Total Points Won
59
|
4-6 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Amandine Hesse
Player
Despina Papamichail
54%
(
21 of
39)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amandine Hesse
Player
Yuliana Lizarazo
53%
(
46 of
86)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
99)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
39 of
64)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
35 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
99)
96
Total Points Won
89
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Miriam Bianca Bulgaru
Player
Amandine Hesse
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve %
47%
(
24 of
51)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Amandine Hesse
Player
Rasheeda Mcadoo
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
47%
(
36 of
76)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
76)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daria Saville
Player
Amandine Hesse
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
10 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mai Hontama
Player
Amandine Hesse
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Amandine Hesse
Player
Kathleen Kanev
54%
(
53 of
98)
1st Serve %
77%
(
69 of
90)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
37 of
69)
40%
(
18 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
46%
(
45 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
44 of
90)
97
Total Points Won
91
|
6-2 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Olivia Gadecki
Player
Amandine Hesse
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
34%
(
27 of
80)
4
Aces
6
10
Double Faults
8
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
80)
84
Total Points Won
66
|
2-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Montgomery Vs Hesse Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Montgomery are available here and Hesse photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
